I recently came across something interesting the other day. An author took exception to a review he received and posted comments arguing his side of things. It got me thinking about the whole idea of being reviewed. The first and most obvious thing is that not everyone will agree with you, not everyone will think that what you have created is wonderful. How do you deal with it?
I remember watching a DVD once. It was called Cellular and was about a young guy who gets a phone call from Kim Basinger who is being held hostage. I really enjoyed it and found all sorts of levels in it that made watching it a really rich and rewarding experience. When I finished watching it and was putting it back in the video shop's box I noticed that someone had written inside. "You have just watched, or about to watch, the worst movie ever made." It was bizarre. This opinion couldn't have been more opposite to the one I had formed of the movie. And yet I could see where the person was coming from. Perhaps at some other time I might have felt the same way about the film.
So does that mean that there is no such thing as something that is universally good, something that everyone can agree on? For the writer, is there a perfect book which everyone will love? It seems impossible for one book is never just one book. It is not the sum of its parts. It is added to by the reader. A book, more so than a movie, involves the reader in a really deep and meaningful way. The mind's eye, which is often underused, is forced into work, picturing characters, scenes and building the words that appear on the page.
The book that you wrote, that you saw in your head, could be very different to the one someone else picks up and reads. The words on the page are the same but what happens in the reader's head is not. And what happens in the reader's head could be different from one day to the next. This is part of the magic of reading, of books and perhaps the main reason why an author can never afford to be precious about what he has written.